Orissa High Court
WP(C)/31755/2024 of M/S FAMOUS SECURITY SERVICE, BBSR Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 2 June 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 31755 of 2024 M/s. Famous Security Service …. Petitioner Mr. Dhananjaya Mund, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and others …. Opp. Parties Mr. Kailash Chandra Kar, Government Advocate for O.P. Nos.1, 3 and 4 Mr. Ramadas Achary,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 31755 of 2024
M/s. Famous Security
Service
….
Petitioner
Mr. Dhananjaya Mund, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others ….
Opp. Parties
Mr. Kailash Chandra Kar,
Government Advocate for O.P.
Nos.1, 3 and 4
Mr. Ramadas Achary, Advocate
for O.P. No.2
CORAM:
JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO
JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
02.06.2026
11.
1. The matter is taken up in virtual mode.
2. The matter has been listed for orders under the heading ‘Withdrawal’.
3. Since the matter relates to Outsourcing of Housekeeping Services at Govt. Health Institutions vide RFP Reference Nos: Nirmal/Housekeeping/ Kalahandi/245, dated 19.01.2024, the matter is listed having been mentioned on behalf of the petitioner.
4. The matter was earlier taken up before the assigned coordinate Bench on several dates.
5. On being asked regarding the urgency of the matter being listed for withdrawal, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has participated in the tender process, which is yet to be finalized and he does not want to pursue the litigation.
Though we have reservations regarding taking up the matter for withdrawal during the vacation being mentioned as urgent, in view of the innocuous prayer made we have taken up the matter. On being asked the learned Government Advocate appearing for opposite party nos.1, 3 and 4 submits that he has no objection if the matter is permitted to be withdrawn. Learned counsel appearing for opposite party no.2 also takes similar stand that he has no objection if the matter is permitted to withdrawn.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo) Vacation Judge
(M.S. Raman) Vacation Judge
Bichi/Laxmikant Digitally Signed Signed by: BICHITRANANDA SAHOO Designation: Secretary Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 03-Jun-2026 16:21:09 Signature Not Verified