Orissa High Court
WP(C)/29702/2024 of SAGARIKA MUDULI Vs ANUROOP NAYAK on 22 May 2026
of 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.29702 of 2024 Sagarika Muduli …. Petitioner Mr. Mihir Kumar Dash, Advocate -versus- Anuroop Nayak …. Opp. Party Mr. Ajay Kumar Nayak, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO Order No. ORDER 22.05.2026 Hybrid Mode 03. 1. The
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.29702 of 2024
Sagarika Muduli
….
Petitioner
Mr. Mihir Kumar Dash, Advocate
-versus-
Anuroop Nayak
….
Opp. Party
Mr. Ajay Kumar Nayak, Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
22.05.2026 Hybrid Mode
03. 1. The matter is listed for orders and is mentioned by the learned counsel for the parties at the beginning of the day’s proceeding.
Learned counsel for the petitioner refers to Memo dated 20.05.2026 which states thus: “That in this writ application the petitioner challenges the legality and correctness of the order passed by the learned family court, cuttack and prayed for enhancement the quantum of maintenance pendete lite and expenses of the proceeding. In the meantime marriage was dissolved basing upon the mutual consent of the both parties in C.P. No.15 of 2025. Therefore, the petitioner does not wants to proceed with the case and the same may be withdrawn. (sic)
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo)
Judge Gs
Digitally Signed Signed by: GAGAN BIHARI SAMAL Reason: Authentication Location: ohc Date: 25-May-2026 21:23:30 Signature Not Verified