Orissa High Court
WP(C)/3111/2026 of MADHUBRATA DASH Vs SOUMYA SAMBIT NATH on 18 May 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.3111 of 2026 Madhubrata Dash …. Petitioner Mr. Aswini Kumar Dash, Advocate -versus- Soumya Sambit Nath …. Opp. Party CORAM: JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO Order No. ORDER 18.05.2026 (Hybrid Mode) 04. 1. The matter was heard at
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.3111 of 2026
Madhubrata Dash
….
Petitioner
Mr. Aswini Kumar Dash, Advocate
-versus-
Soumya Sambit Nath
….
Opp. Party
CORAM:
JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
18.05.2026 (Hybrid Mode)
04.
1. The matter was heard at some length on 31.03.2026 and the following order was passed: “1. Learned counsel for the petitioner is heard at some length.
2. The petitioner-wife in the marriage is before this Court, she has filed the present writ application with the following prayer:
“It is therefore humbly prayed that in view of the facts and circumstances this Hon’ble Court may admit the writ application and issue notice to the Opp. Party (husband) and after hearing the I.A. reject the same for the ends of justice;
And may pass any other order(s)/directions as would deem fit and proper.”
3. Perusal of the prayer indicates that the petitioner prays before this Court for rejection of the I.A. No.19 of 2025 arising out of C.P. No.83 of 2025 pending before the learned Judge, Family Court, Sambalpur.
4. The learned counsel was asked under which provision such prayer can be entertained i.e. this Court in exercising writ Digitally Signed Signed by: RAJESH KUMAR BADHEI Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 22-May-2026 19:32:19 Signature Not Verified jurisdiction purportedly under Article 227 of the Constitution of India can direct dismissal of a I.A. pending adjudication before the Court of jurisdiction.
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks and has adjournment.
5. The matter shall be listed in the week commencing 27.04.2026.”
2. Today, the matter being in the list and taken up, memo of date is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner which states thus: “Petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ application since this has been adjudicated in the trial Court.” (sic)
Memo shall be taken on record. Scanned copy be updated.
3. The petition is disposed of accordingly.
(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo) Judge Rajesh