Orissa High Court

WP(C)/11732/2023 of M/S CEF ENGINEERING, BBSR Vs DY. DIRECTOR (REVENUE), ESIC, BBSR on 14 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.11732 of 2023 M/s. CEF Engineering, Bhubaneswar …. Petitioner Mr. S. Mishra, Advocate -versus- Assistant Director (Revenue), Employees State Insurance Corporation & another …. Opp. Parties Mr. N.D. Tripathy, Advocate along

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.11732 of 2023

M/s. CEF Engineering,

Bhubaneswar

….

Petitioner

Mr. S. Mishra, Advocate

-versus-

Assistant Director (Revenue),

Employees State Insurance

Corporation & another

….

Opp. Parties

Mr. N.D. Tripathy, Advocate

along with

Mr. A.P. Ray, Standing Counsel

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

No.

ORDER

14.05.2026 (Hybrid Mode)

13. I.A. No.6435 of 2026 & W.P.(C) No.11732 of 2023

1. The matter being in the list is mentioned by Mr. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Tripathy, learned counsel for the opposite parties.

2. I.A. No.6435 of 2026 has been filed for granting leave to the parties to avail the benefit of the ‘Amnesty Scheme 2025’ promulgated by the opposite parties during pendency of the writ application.

3. Annexed to the I.A. is letter dated 27.10.2025 issued by the Regional Director, Odisha, Bhubaneswar,

Office letter dated 27.10.2025 issued to the petitioner by the Regional Director, Employees’ State Insurance Corporation (Ministry of Labour & Employment, Govt. of India), Regional Office, Odisha, Bhubaneswar. The said letter is scanned and reproduced herein:

4. The learned counsel for the opposite parties endorses the submissions made in the I.A. and made at the bar by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

5. In view of the above developments, it is expected that the parties shall work out amicable settlement as per the Amnesty Scheme acceptable to both the parties and this Court in no uncertain terms encourages such

Amit settlement in view of the Amnesty Scheme dated 27.10.2025.

The parties shall work on the Amnesty Scheme dated 27.10.2025 and arrive at a settlement.

6. It is further clarified that contentions raised in the writ application shall not be bar in any manner whatsoever for the parties to work out amicable settlement in terms of the ‘Amnesty Scheme’.

Interim order, if any, passed earlier by this Court shall merge with the order passed today. Any order passed earlier shall not in any manner come in the way of the parties to arrive at a settlement.

7. The writ petition along with all the pending I.As. are disposed of with the observations as made above.

(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo)

Judge

Digitally Signed Signed by: AMIT KUMAR MOHANTY Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 15-May-2026 16:44:35 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead