Orissa High Court

WP(C)/13575/2026 of BIRA KISHORE JANKA Vs THE COMMISSIONER, CT AND GST, CUTTACK on 12 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No.13575 of 2026 Bira Kishore Janka … Petitioner Mr.Subash Chandra Sahoo, Advocate -Versus- The Commissioner, CT & GST and another … Opposite Parties Mr. Sunil Mishra, Standing Counsel CORAM: THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WP(C) No.13575 of 2026

Bira Kishore Janka

…

Petitioner

Mr.Subash Chandra Sahoo, Advocate

-Versus-

The Commissioner, CT & GST and

another

…

Opposite Parties

Mr. Sunil Mishra, Standing Counsel

CORAM:

THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

AND

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

12.05.2026

01.

1. Learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, under challenge is show cause notice dated 19th December, 2018 followed by order dated 2nd January, 2019 cancelling his client’s registration under Odisha Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. He submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay the tax, interest, late fee, penalty and any other sum required to be paid for the return form of his client to be accepted by the Department. He relies on order dated 16th November, 2022 of coordinate Bench in W.P.(C) No.30374 of 2022 (M/s. Mohanty Enterprises v. The Commissioner, CT & GST, Odisha, Cuttack and others). He submits, his client’s claim to relief including prayer for condonation of delay is covered by said order.

2. We reproduce below paragraph-2 from said order in M/s. Mohanty Enterprises (supra).

"2. In that view of the matter, the delay in Petitioner’s invoking the proviso to Rule 23 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Rules (OGST Rules) is condoned and it is directed that subject to the Petitioner depositing all the taxes, interest, late fee, penalty etc., due and complying with other formalities, the Petitioner’s application for revocation will be considered in accordance with law."

Likewise direction is made in this writ petition. Petitioner gets the relief in the interest of revenue.

3. The writ petition is disposed of.

(Harish Tandon) Chief Justice

(M.S. Raman) Judge

Aswini Digitally Signed Signed by: ASWINI KUMAR SETHY Designation: PERSONAL ASSISTANT (SECY I/C) Reason: Authentication Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK Date: 13-May-2026 16:06:36 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead