Patna High Court
CR. MISC./58749/2026 of Shiv Sahani Vs The State of Bihar on 21 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58749 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-18 Year-2023 Thana- CHHAURADANO District- East Champaran ====================================================== Shiv Sahani S/o Briksha Sahani Resident of village - Ajgarwa, P.S - Lakhaura, District
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58749 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-18 Year-2023 Thana- CHHAURADANO District- East Champaran ======================================================
Shiv Sahani S/o Briksha Sahani Resident of village - Ajgarwa, P.S - Lakhaura, District - East Champaran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Abhishek Kumar
For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Sucheta Yadav
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
Page 1 of 3
21-08-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 353, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of four cases under the Excise Act and is in custody since 21.04.2026 and allegation is of recovery of 20 liters of liquor from a motorcycle and Rupesh Sahani is alleged to have fired and from the place of occurrence two empty cartridges were recovered.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58749 of 2026(2) dt.21-08-2026
Page 2 of 3
petitioner was not apprehended from the spot, but since he was earlier implicated in cases relating to Excise, hence came to be implicated in the instant case based on secret information which is the easiest way to implicate someone, when petitioner is not even the owner of the seized motorcycle.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the bail application of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Chhauradano P.S. Case No. 18 of 2023.
Rishabh/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…