Patna High Court
CR. MISC./48151/2026 of Md. Sajjad @ Sajjad Alam @ Sajjad Vs The State of Bihar on 21 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48151 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-302 Year-2024 Thana- DHAKA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Md. Sajjad @ Sajjad Alam @ Sajjad Son of Md. Ansar @ Ansar @ Kanth @ Ranth Resident of
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48151 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-302 Year-2024 Thana- DHAKA District- East Champaran ======================================================
Md. Sajjad @ Sajjad Alam @ Sajjad Son of Md. Ansar @ Ansar @ Kanth @
Ranth Resident of Village- Lahan Dhaka, P.S.- Dhaka, District- East Champaran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Zaki Haider, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Satya Nand Shukla,APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
Page 1 of 3
21-08-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 329(4), 324(4), 326(g), 115(2), 109, 132, 221, 121(1), 121(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of two cases and is in custody since 24.05.2026, it is next submitted that prosecution story in short is that the accused persons including the petitioner were enraged when the deceased was brought to the hospital and was declared dead by the doctor, accordingly, the accused persons including the petitioner created ruckus and set ambulance on fire and the accused were identified by the video footage.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48151 of 2026(2) dt.21-08-2026
Page 2 of 3
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant, it is further submitted that Md. Monaf @ Munaf had approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Cr. Misc No. 26168 of 2026 and the same came to be allowed by an order dated 08.05.2026. It is further submitted that even allegation against the petitioner is general and omnibus in nature.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Dhaka P.S. Case No. 302 of 2024.
7. Accordingly, this regular bail application stands allowed.
Nitesh/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…