Patna High Court
MJC/1554/2025 of Realty Advance Structure Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State of Bihar through Mr. Mihir Kumar Singh, the Additional Chief Secretary on 21 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1554 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4212 of 2024 ====================================================== Realty Advance Structure Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Head Office, House No. 955, Maurya Path, Khajpura, Near Pillar No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1554 of 2025
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4212 of 2024
======================================================
Realty Advance Structure Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Head Office, House No. 955, Maurya Path, Khajpura, Near Pillar No. 15, Bailey Road, P.S- Hawai Adda, Distt.-Patna through its Managing Director namely Dharmendra Kumar, male, aged about 47 years, Son of Ashutosh Kumar, Resident of Village- Chhaku Bigha, P.O-Kanap, P.S- Haspura, District- Aurangabad.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through Mr. Mihir Kumar Singh, the Additional Chief Secretary Road Construction Department, Patna.
2.
Mr. Mihir Kumar Singh, the Additional Chief Secretary, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3.
Mr. Bhagwat Ram, the Engineer in Chief, (Work Management), Road Construction Department, Bihar Patna.
4.
Mr. Jay Kishor Thakur, the Chief Engineer (North), Road Construction Department, Bihar Patna.
5.
Mr. Aamir Nayyer, the Internal Financial Adviser, Road Construction Department, Bihar Patna.
6.
Mr. Sanjay Sharma, the Superintendent Engineer, Saran Road Circle, Hajipur.
7.
Mr. Shubham Kumar, The Executive Engineer, Road Division, Chhapra.
... ... Opposite Party/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Government Advocate 5
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
21-08-2026 Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
2. The present application has been preferred: "for initiation of contempt proceeding against the contemnors/opposite parties for their willful disobedience of the order dated 20.09.2024 passed in CWJC No. 4212 of 2024.”
Patna High Court MJC No.1554 of 2025(6) dt.21-08-2026
3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order stands complied.
4. In that background, the present contempt petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
Sanny/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U
Page 1 of 1
Loading citations and judicial treatment…