Patna High Court

MJC/1148/2025 of Shabbir Ahmad Vs The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, on 21 August 2026

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1146 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12514 of 2023 ====================================================== Shabbir Ahmad Son of Late Md. Umar Draz, Resident of Masood Bigha, Barh, P.S. Barh, District- Patna. ... ...

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1146 of 2025

In

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12514 of 2023

======================================================

Versus

1.

2.

Sri Chandra Shekhar Singh, the District Magistrate, Patna.

3.

Sri Subhas Kumar Sharma, the deputy Election Officer (Panchayat)-cum- District Panchayat Raj Officer, Patna.

4.

Sri Ashok Kumar, the Block Development Officer, Bakhtiyarpur, District- Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

with

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 1147 of 2025

In

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11691 of 2023

======================================================

Versus

1.

Page 1 of 6

2.

Sri Chandra Shekhar Singh, the District Magistrate, Patna.

3.

Sri Subhas Kumar Sharma, the Deputy Election Officer (Panchayat)-cum- District Panchayat Raj Officer Patna.

4.

Smt. Kumari Anju, the Block Development Officer, Barh, District- Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

with

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 1148 of 2025

In

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11875 of 2023

======================================================

Versus

1.

Page 2 of 6

2.

Sri Chandra Shekhar Singh, the District Magistrate, Patna.

3.

Sri Subhas Kumar Sharma, the deputy Election Officer (Panchayat)-cum- District Panchayat Raj Officer, Patna.

4.

Sri Ravi Kumar, the Block Development Officer, Mokama, District- Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

(In Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 1146 of 2025)

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Md. Anisur Rahman, Advocate

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Government Advocate 5

(In Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 1147 of 2025)

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Md. Anisur Rahman, Advocate

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Government Advocate 5

(In Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 1148 of 2025)

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Md. Anisur Rahman, Advocate

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Government Advocate 5

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY

ORAL ORDER

Page 3 of 6

21-08-2026 Heard Mr. Md. Anisur Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioners in all the three contempt petitions and learned State counsel.

2. The MJC No. 1146 of 2025 has been preferred: "for initiation of contempt proceeding against the contemnors/opposite parties for their willful disobedience of the order dated 05.12.2024 passed in CWJC No. 12514 of 2023.”

3. Paragraph nos. 3 to 8 of the show cause read as under: “3. That in light of the order dated 05.12.2024 passed in C.W.J.C no. 11691/23 by the

Page 4 of 6

Hon'ble Court, the District Election Officer (Panchayat) cum District Magistrate, Patna, has convened a meeting on 07.03.2025 in the presence of the concerned authorities including D.D.C., Patna, D.P.R.O., Patna, Election Officers cum B.D.O., Barh, Bakhtiyarpur, Mokama and also the representative of the petitioner Shri Shabbir Ahmad. The proceeding of the meeting contained in memo no.1250 dated 11.04.2025 is annexed herewith and marked as for kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court.

4. That it is humbly submitted that the bills submitted by the petitioner for the work done in Barh, Mokama and Bakhtiyarpur during the Panchayat General Elections 2021, has been well examined/enquired by the three member committee constituted at the District level and accordingly the amounts paid to the petitioner has been calculated which has been clearly shown in the tabular chart in the said memo no.1250 dated 11.04.2025.

5. That the M/s Sahani Tent House has been proportionately paid the bill amount on basis

Page 5 of 6

of the letter no.-68, dated-16.03.2021 issued by the Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, wherein for every election booth an amount of Rs. 11,000/- is to be spent as office expenditure and accordingly the allotments have been made for the Panchayat General Election-2021, in this regard.

6. That for each booth/centre, M/s Sahani Tent House has been paid @Rs. 10,258/-for the Chair, Table, Pandal, Shamiyana and temporary electric connection furnished. This is in accordance with the payments done to the other Agencies for the Panchayat General Election- 2021.

7. That accordingly the total payments of Rs. 17,72,382/-has been done to the petitioner in which the earlier amount of Rs. 10,75,006/- received by the M/s Sahani Tent House from the Block Office, Barh, has been adjusted.

8. That the entire due amount for the work done by the M/s Sahani Tent House has been paid and nothing is due or pending.”

4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners submit that he be granted liberty to file appropriate petition before appropriate Court for the redressal of the grievance as the entire payment has still not been made.

5. Learned State counsel has no objection to it.

6. In that background, granting said liberty, the present contempt petitions stand disposed of.

sanny/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U

Page 6 of 6

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead