Patna High Court

CR. MISC./59912/2026 of Dhrup Sahani @ Dhruv Sahani Vs The State of Bihar on 21 August 2026

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59912 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-35 Year-2026 Thana- BANJARIA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Dhrup Sahani @ Dhruv Sahani S/O Sukhari Sahani R/V- Jhakhiya, PS- Banjariya, Distt- East

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59912 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-35 Year-2026 Thana- BANJARIA District- East Champaran ======================================================

Dhrup Sahani @ Dhruv Sahani S/O Sukhari Sahani R/V- Jhakhiya, PS- Banjariya, Distt- East Champaran

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Priyesh Kumar

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA

ORAL ORDER

Page 1 of 3

21-08-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 274, 275 of the BNS and Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of three cases, out of which, two cases are under the Excise Act and is in custody since 19.06.2026 and allegation is of recovery of 200 litres of liquor from a place near Patiya Mai Asthan.

4. It is next submitted that petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even alleged recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioner and is accessible to villagers at Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59912 of 2026(2) dt.21-08-2026

Page 2 of 3

large and he came to be implicated at the instance of chowkidar with whom he is on an inimical term.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5000/- (Rupees five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Banjariya P.S. Case No.35 of 2026.

amit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead