Patna High Court
CR. MISC./43800/2026 of Arvind Rai Vs The State of Bihar on 20 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43800 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-128 Year-2026 Thana- SONEPUR District- Saran ====================================================== 1. Arvind Rai S/o Ravindra @ Gopal Jee @ Gopji R/o Village - Pahleja Sahpur Diyra, P.S - Sonepur
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43800 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-128 Year-2026 Thana- SONEPUR District- Saran ======================================================
1.
Arvind Rai S/o Ravindra @ Gopal Jee @ Gopji R/o Village - Pahleja Sahpur Diyra, P.S - Sonepur (Sonpur), District - Saran
2.
Ravindra @ Gopal Jee @ Gopji S/o Late Sukhdev Rai R/o Village - Pahleja Sahpur Diyra, P.S - Sonepur (Sonpur), District - Saran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha, Advocate
For the State
:
Mr. Satyendra Prasad, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
20-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Sonepur (Sonpur) P.S. Case No. 128 of 2026 registered for the offence under Sections of the 25 (1-B) (a), 26 and 35 of Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, one country made pistol (Katta) with a live catridge were recovered from the possession of the petitioners.
4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioners are in Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43800 of 2026(3) dt.20-08-2026
custody since 09.02.2026 and they claim to have clean antecedent.
5. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioners.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners and also considering the period of custody of the petitioners, this bail application is allowed.
7. Let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra/ concerned Court below in connection with Sonepur (Sonpur) P.S. Case No. 128 of 2026.
8. The petitioners, after being released on bail, are directed to mark their attendance at Sonepur (Sonpur) Police Station, District Saran, on every Sunday of the month. Any default in appearance at the police station will result in cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioners.
9. This is also subject to the condition that the antecedent of the petitioners shall be verified before accepting their bail bonds and if the same is not found to be clean, their Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43800 of 2026(3) dt.20-08-2026
bail bonds shall not be accepted.
10. It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioners at any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
shalini/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T