Patna High Court

CR. MISC./48864/2026 of Ritesh Upaadhyay @ Omprakash Upadhyay Vs The state of bihar on 20 August 2026

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48864 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-421 Year-2025 Thana- LAURIA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Ritesh Upaadhyay @ Omprakash Upadhyay S/o Late Praduman Upadhyay R/o Village - Pakarihar,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48864 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-421 Year-2025 Thana- LAURIA District- West Champaran ======================================================

Ritesh Upaadhyay @ Omprakash Upadhyay S/o Late Praduman Upadhyay R/o Village - Pakarihar, P.S. - Shanichari, Dist. - West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The state of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Sharad Kumar Verma

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA

ORAL ORDER

Page 1 of 3

20-08-2026 Heard the parties.

2. The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and apprehending his arrest in connection with Lauriya P.S. Case No.421/2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2), 316(2) and 318(4) of the BNS.

3. The allegation against petitioner is to collect bribe from the innocent persons on the pretext of obtaining favour from government officials in mutation and other procedural matters related with land revenue.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that allegation against petitioner is completely based upon hearsay input. It is submitted that petitioner is a local farmer and without having any cogent material he was implicated with the present crime in question. It is submitted that when local farmers raised issue regarding Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48864 of 2026(3) dt.20-08-2026

Page 2 of 3

corrupt practices of the Circle Office, petitioner being innocent farmer was implicated with the present case. Petitioner claimed clean antecedent.

5. Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.

6. In view of aforesaid factual submission and by taking note of fact as the implication of petitioner prima-facie appears on the basis of suspicion, accordingly petitioner above- named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks, is directed to be released on bail, furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM-XI, West Champaran at Bettiah/concerned Court, where the case is pending in connection with Lauriya P.S. Case No.421/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of BNSS.

S.Tripathi/- (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) U T

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead