Patna High Court
MJC/206/2025 of Ravi Shankar Kumar Vs The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar on 20 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.206 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5335 of 2023 ====================================================== 1. Ravi Shankar Kumar Son of Abhinandan Choudhary, Resident of Village/Mohalla- Ashok Nagar, P.S.- Chitragupta Nagar,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.206 of 2025
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5335 of 2023
======================================================
1.
Ravi Shankar Kumar Son of Abhinandan Choudhary, Resident of Village/Mohalla- Ashok Nagar, P.S.- Chitragupta Nagar, District- Khagaria.
2.
Manisha Kumari, Daughter of Ram Chandra Yadav, Resident of Ward No.- 14, Shobhapura, P.S. - Hasanpur, District - Samastipur.
3.
Anjani Kumari, Daughter of Gajendra Yadav, Resident of Ward No.- 4, Suraha Basantpur, P.S.- Hasanpur, District - Samastipur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar Patna namely Amrit Lal Meena, Son of not known to the Petitioner.
2.
Dr. B. Rajender, Son of not known to the Petitioner, the Principal Secretary, Department of General Administration, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.
3.
Pratyay Amrit, Son of not known to the Petitioner, the Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna namely.
4.
Dr. R.C.S. Verma, Son of not known to the Petitioner, the Director In-Chief, Health Services, Department of Health, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariate, Patna.
5.
Dr. Amitabh Sinha, Son of not known to the Petitioner, the Civil Surgeon- cum-Chief Medical Officer, Khagaria.
6.
Bihar Technical Service Commission, 19, Harding Road, Patna through its Secretary namely Arunabh Chandra Verma (Joint Secretary), son of not known to the Petitioner.
7.
Dr. N. Saravan Kumar, Son of not known to the Petitioner, the Chairman, Bihar Technical Service Commission, 19, Harding Road, Patna.
8.
Arunabh Chandra Verma (Joint Secretary), son of not known to the Petitioner, The Secretary, Bihar Technical Service Commission, 19, Harding Road, Patna.
... ... Opposite Party/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Arun Kumar, Advocate
For the State
:
Mr.Kamlesh Kishore, AC to SC-12
For BTSC
:
Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Advocate
Ms. Jyoti, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
20-08-2026 Heard the parties.
Page 1 of 3
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s) "for initiation of contempt proceeding against the contemnors/opposite parties for their willful disobedience of the order dated 01.11.2023 passed in CWJC No.5335 of 2023."
3. The show cause of opposite party nos. 06 to 08 is on record and paragraph-7 read as under:
7. that at this stage it is pertinent to mention here that though the petitioners have not any representation before the Bihar Technical Service Commission but the answering respondents are advised to brought on record relevant facts in regard to these petitioners and the reasons for not awarding them weightage point in respect of work experience. It is submitted that all the three writ petitioners have filed their online application in respect of Advt. No. 01/2022. It is stated that the
Page 2 of 3
petitioner no. 1 Ravi Shankar Kumar has filed his online application bearing Regd. No. BR00150450001027 and in the column of work experience he has categorically marked as "NO". It is further stated that petitioner no. 2 Anjani Kumari has filed her online application bearing Regd. No. BR00150450000502 and he has also marked "NO" in the column prescribed for claim of work experience. It is submitted that petitioner No. 3 Manisha Kumari has filed her online application bearing Regd. No. BR00150450000511 and she has also marked "NO" in the column of work experience. It is submitted that all the above aspect could be appreciated by perusal of their respective online applications which are brought on record.
4. The aforesaid fact clearly shows that when the petitioners themselves have recorded their that they have no in the application form filed by them, no contempt is made out.
5. Learned counsel for the opposite parties submit that cost be imposed upon the petitioners.
6. Refraining from do so and after recording paragraph-7 of the show cause, the MJC No. 206 of 2025 is disposed of.
Ravi/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…