Patna High Court
MJC/2580/2025 of Dr. Mahatim Singh Vs The Mr. Shailendra Nath Chaturvedi, V.C. Veer Kuwar Singh University on 20 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2580 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3647 of 2025 ====================================================== Dr. Mahatim Singh Son of Late Rambahadur Singh, Resident of Village- Baruri, P.O- Kurari, P.S- Durgawati, District-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2580 of 2025
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3647 of 2025
======================================================
Dr. Mahatim Singh Son of Late Rambahadur Singh, Resident of Village- Baruri, P.O- Kurari, P.S- Durgawati, District- Kaimur, Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The Mr. Shailendra Nath Chaturvedi, V.C. Veer Kuwar Singh University Arah.
2.
The R.K. Thakur Registrar, Veer Kuwar Singh University, Arah.
3.
Prof Awadh Bihari Singh, University Representative of the governing body of Maharan Pratap College, Mohaniya, Kaimur.
4.
Sri Santish Kumar a people representative of the governing body of Maharan Pratap College, Mohaniya, Kaimur.
5.
Dr. Shambhu Nath Singh Son of Shri Vaidya Nath Singh, Resident of Village- Gorihari Gopal, P.O.- Dariya Kafen, Goriyari, District- Muzaffarpur, Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Swarna Roy, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rajesh Prasad Choudhary, Advocate
Mr. Shyama Kant Singh, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
20-08-2026 Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defect(s).
2. Heard Mrs. Archana Sinha, learned Senior counsel for the petitioner duly assisted by Ms. Komal and Mr. Shashi Bhushan Singh for the opposite party no. 5 (Dr. Shambhu Nath Singh).
3. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s):
Patna High Court MJC No.2580 of 2025(3) dt.20-08-2026
Page 1 of 2
“for initiation of contempt proceeding against the contemnors/opposite parties for their willful disobedience of the order dated 05.03.2025 passed in CWJC No. 3647 of 2025.”
4. At the outset, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 5 submits that he filed the writ petition (CWJC No. 3647 of 2025) and got the order, but instead, the respondent no. 5, Dr. Mahatim Singh of the said writ petition has filed the present contempt petition which may be dismissed with cost.
5. At this stage, learned Senior counsel for the petitioner submits that liberty be granted to file appropriate petition.
6. After recording the aforesaid fact and granting said liberty, the present contempt petition stands disposed of.
Adnan/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…