Patna High Court
CR. MISC./48382/2026 of Sujit Kumar @ Sujit Kumar Das @ Sujit Vs The State of Bihar on 20 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48382 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-316 Year-2025 Thana- BENIPATTI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Sujit Kumar @ Sujit Kumar Das @ Sujit S/o Sajiwan Das @ Sajiwan Khatbey R/o Village - Agai,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48382 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-316 Year-2025 Thana- BENIPATTI District- Madhubani ======================================================
Sujit Kumar @ Sujit Kumar Das @ Sujit S/o Sajiwan Das @ Sajiwan Khatbey R/o Village - Agai, P.S - Benipatti, District - Madhubani
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav, Adv.
Mr. Rohit Kant Singh, Adv.
Mr. Ravi Prakash, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
ORAL ORDER
Page 1 of 3
20-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Benipatti P.S. Case No. 316 of 2025 lodged on 01.10.2025, for the offence punishable under Sections 80 & 3(5) of the BNS, 2023, pending in the court of A.C.J.M., Benipatti.
3. As per the prosecution case, FIR has been lodged against six named accused persons with allegation that all the accused persons have assaulted the informant’s daughter and subsequently, killed her.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent and he is in custody Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48382 of 2026(3) dt.20-08-2026
Page 2 of 3
since 17.03.2026. Counsel submits that the petitioner is husband of the deceased and due to some quarrel between the husband and wife, the wife has committed suicide.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner is the husband of the deceased.
6. As such, in the present facts and circumstances of the case considering that the petitioner is the husband of the deceased, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at present. Accordingly, the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner stands rejected at present.
Anjali/Somesh- (Dr. Anshuman, J) U T
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…