Patna High Court
CWJC/7040/2024 of Subodh Sah Vs The State of Bihar on 20 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7040 of 2024 ====================================================== Subodh Sah son of Late Yogendra Sah resident of village- Saidpur, P.S.- Chhourahi, District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7040 of 2024
======================================================
Subodh Sah son of Late Yogendra Sah resident of village- Saidpur, P.S.- Chhourahi, District- Begusarai
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Begusarai.
2.
The Sub-Divisional Officer, Manjhoul, District- Begusarai.
3.
The D.C.L.R. Manjhoul, District- Begusarai.
4.
The Circle Officer, Chourahi, District- Begusarai
5.
The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Malpur, P.S. Chhourahi, District- Begusarai.
6.
Chandrabhushan Das, Son of Late Shyam Sakha Das resident of Village- Saidpur, P.S.- Chhourahi, District- Begusarai.
7.
Jaynarayan Das son of Late Shyam Sakha Das, resident of Village- Saidpur, P.S.- Chhourahi, District- Begusarai.
... ... Respondent/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
: Mr. Bhubneshwar Mahto, Advocate
Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate
For the State
: Mrs. Shally Kumari, AC to SC-24
For the Respondent Nos. 6 & 7 : Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
Page 1 of 3
20-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 6 & 7 and the learned counsel for the State.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing at length, seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy before the appropriate forum.
3. Permission, as prayed for, is granted.
4. As such, the present writ petition stands disposed of Patna High Court CWJC No.7040 of 2024(5) dt.20-08-2026
Page 2 of 3
with the aforesaid liberty.
5. If the petitioner is so advised, he may file an appeal within two weeks from today, and the authority concerned shall disposed of it within three months.
6. It is expected that the ‘Authority concerned’ will not take any coercive steps until the petitioner’s appeal is heard.
7. It is directed that the learned lower Court/appropriate authority shall look into the issue of limitation afresh, taking into account the fact that the petitioner had approached this Hon’ble High Court by way of the instant writ petition.
Bipin/- (Alok Kumar, J) U
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…