Patna High Court
CR. MISC./57527/2026 of Md. Ahmad Vs The State of Bihar on 19 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57527 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-143 Year-2026 Thana- CHAUTHAM District- Khagaria ====================================================== Md. Ahmad S/o Late Razak R/o Vill- Guleriya, P.S.- Chautham, Distt- Khagaria ... ...
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57527 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-143 Year-2026 Thana- CHAUTHAM District- Khagaria ======================================================
Md. Ahmad S/o Late Razak R/o Vill- Guleriya, P.S.- Chautham, Distt- Khagaria
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Aditya Kumar, Advocate
For the State
:
Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
19-08-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Chautham P.S. Case No. 143 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-B)(a), 25(1-A), 25(1-AA), 26(1), 26(2) and 35 of the Arms Act, lodged on 06.05.2026 by the informant Ajit Kumar.
3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that on information that the petitioner is manufacturing guns inside his house, the place was raided four persons including two women who wanted to escape were arrested and number of things which relate to manufacturing of the gun were recovered/seized beside the cartridges and other items. This led to the F.I.R.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57527 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026
was in the house, remains outside and only because confidential information was attributed to him, got implicated.
5. Learned APP on the other hand opposes the prayer submitting that he is the mastermind of the entire manufacturing unit and the alibi of the remaining outside has to be ignored.
6. Taking into account the aforesaid facts as also the allegation that has come in the F.I.R., no relief can be extended to him.
7. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application stands rejected.
vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U T