Patna High Court

CR. MISC./57477/2026 of Savita Devi Vs The State of Bihar on 19 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57477 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-208 Year-2026 Thana- BIKRAM District- Patna ====================================================== 1. Savita Devi S/o Bhagwan Bhagat 2. Bhagwan Bhagat S/o Dhanraj Bhagat 3. Rahul Kumar S/o Bhagwan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57477 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-208 Year-2026 Thana- BIKRAM District- Patna ======================================================

1.

Savita Devi S/o Bhagwan Bhagat

2.

Bhagwan Bhagat S/o Dhanraj Bhagat

3.

Rahul Kumar S/o Bhagwan Bhagat

All are resident of Village - Datiyana, P.S. - Bikram, District - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr.Ajay Kumar Sinha, Advocate

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

19-08-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and the learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Bikram P.S.Case No.208 of 2026, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 109, 303(2), 351(2), 351(3), 352 and 3(5) of BNS.

3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, the co- accused persons including the petitioners assaulted the informant’s side, as a result, they sustained injuries.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that there is case and counter case between the parties and the petitioners’ side have also lodged Bikram P.S.Case No.207 of 2026 against the informant’s side. Both sides have sustained injuries in the same incident. Petitioners have clean antecedent.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57477 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioners.

6. Having considered the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, considering the fact that there is case and counter case between the parties and the petitioners’ side have also sustained injuries, the petitioners are directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned district court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-VI, Danapur/concerned court, in connection with Bikrma P.S.Case No.208 of 2026, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of BNSS of 2023

7. The learned district court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and if it is found that the petitioners are involved in some other cases as what has been stated in paragraph No.3 of the bail application, this order will automatically lose its force.

chn/- (Purnendu Singh, J) U T

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead