Patna High Court

MJC/2075/2019 of Shreedhar Prasad Singh Vs The State of Bihar on 19 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2075 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1488 of 2019 ====================================================== Shreedhar Prasad Singh Son of Late Matru Prasad Singh Resident of Village- madrouni, P.O- Madrouni, P.S.- Rangra

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2075 of 2019

In

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1488 of 2019

======================================================

Shreedhar Prasad Singh Son of Late Matru Prasad Singh Resident of Village- madrouni, P.O- Madrouni, P.S.- Rangra Chowk, District- Bhagalpur at present residing at Mohalla Sahban Hata, Purnea Court Station Road, janta Chowk, Purnea, Police Station Khajanchi Hat, District- Purnea.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Through Mr. Sudhir Kumar Singh, I.A.S. presently posted as Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

Mr. Adesh Titarmare I.A.S. Presently posted as Joint Director (Shashya)

Jute, Agriculture Department Government of Bihar, Purnea, Bihar.

3.

Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Presently posted as Joint Director (Shashya) Jute, Agriculture Department Government of Bihar, Purnea, Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Gyanand Roy, Adv.

Ms. Naina Nancy, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Raghwanand (GA11)

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

2 19-08-2026 Ms. Naina Nancy, Junior counsel to Mr. Gyanand Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition.

2. Permission stands accorded.

3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

perwez (Ajit Kumar, J) U

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead