Patna High Court
CR. MISC./59252/2026 of Ajit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 19 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59252 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-47 Year-2026 Thana- LACHHUAR District- Jamui ====================================================== Ajit Kumar S/o Munni Yadav R/o Village- Ghoghra, PS- Kawakol, Dist.- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59252 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-47 Year-2026 Thana- LACHHUAR District- Jamui ======================================================
Ajit Kumar S/o Munni Yadav R/o Village- Ghoghra, PS- Kawakol, Dist.- Nawada
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Pramod Kumar Verma, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Satya Nand Shukla, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
19-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Lachhuar P.S. case No. 47 of 2026, instituted for the offences under Sections 317(4) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The Prosecution case, in short, is that in course of Police checking, the petitioner and other co-accused were apprehended with a stolen motorcycle. On query, petitioner failed to produce any valid paper regarding the motorcycle. After verification, it is found that the said motorcycle belongs to one Niraj Kumar, who is resident of Nalanda.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The counsel further submits that petitioner is in custody since 09.04.2026 and he has ten criminal antecedents.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59252 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Having heard the parties. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into consideration the criminal history of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.
7. Accordingly, the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner is, hereby, rejected.
manish/- (Alok Kumar, J) U T