Patna High Court

CR. MISC./59057/2026 of Shivam Kumar @ Satyam Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 19 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59057 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-200 Year-2026 Thana- CHANDI District- Nalanda ====================================================== Shivam Kumar @ Satyam Kumar S/O Rambali Bind R/O Village- Kutrupur, Police Station- Khijarsarai,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59057 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-200 Year-2026 Thana- CHANDI District- Nalanda ======================================================

Shivam Kumar @ Satyam Kumar S/O Rambali Bind R/O Village- Kutrupur, Police Station- Khijarsarai, District- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr.Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar, APP

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

19-08-2026 Heard Mr.Anil Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Binod Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No.200 of 2026, dated 13.03.2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 109(1) of BNS.

3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he intentionally pushed the victim from a bridge causing grievous injuries to her.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent. The allegation as alleged in the FIR is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. In fact the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59057 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026

victim has herself fallen on the place of occurrence and she has received the injury.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that from a bare perusal of the injury report which suggests that the victim has received the grievous injury.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts, injuries is grievous in nature and there is direct and specific allegation against the petitioner in the FIR, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No.200 of 2026 pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Hilsa, Nalanda.

7. Prayer is refused.

Nitesh/- (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) U T

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead