Patna High Court
CR. MISC./57776/2026 of Sanjeev Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar on 19 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57776 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-96 Year-2018 Thana- SONO District- Jamui ====================================================== Sanjeev Kumar Singh S/O Hardev Singh R/O Village- Bisambarpur, P.S.- Taryani, Chapra, Distt.- Shivhar.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57776 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-96 Year-2018 Thana- SONO District- Jamui ======================================================
Sanjeev Kumar Singh S/O Hardev Singh R/O Village- Bisambarpur, P.S.- Taryani, Chapra, Distt.- Shivhar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Sanju Singh
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Kalyan Shankar
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
19-08-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of IPC and Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of one case and allegation is of recovery of 225 litres of liquor from a pickup vehicle.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and he came to be implicated based on the fact that he is owner of the seized vehicle. It is next submitted that no prudent person would use his own vehicle for committing an occurrence and thus would Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57776 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026
create evidence against himself and hence would get implicated, it is further submitted that petitioner was completely unaware that Sanjay would misuse the vehicle in the manner as alleged, who was also apprehended from the spot.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sono P.S. Case No. 96 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
7. It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than one case then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his antecedent before this Court, as such, the provisional Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57776 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026
anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of one case in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.
Sumit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T