Patna High Court
CWJC/18813/2024 of Geeta Devi Vs The State Election Commission (Panchayat), on 19 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18813 of 2024 ====================================================== Geeta Devi, wife of Ram Lakhan Paswan, resident of village- Rampur Madan, P.S. Bahadurpur District - Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Election
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18813 of 2024
======================================================
Geeta Devi, wife of Ram Lakhan Paswan, resident of village- Rampur Madan, P.S. Bahadurpur District - Darbhanga.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Election Commission (Panchayat), Sone Bhawan Birchand Patel Path, Patna through the Secretary
2.
The District Magistrate cum- District Election Officer (Panchayat), Darbhanga, District - Darbhanga.
3.
The Sub- Divisional Officer-cum-Returning Officer, Bahadurpur, District - Darbhanga.
4.
Seeta Devi wife of Shambhu Paswan Resident of village and P.S.
Bahadurpur, District - Darbhanga,
5.
Arti Devi wife of not known to the petitioner Resident of village- Rampur Madan, P.S.- Bahadurpur, District- Darbhanga.
... ... Respondent/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Madhav Jha, Adv,
Mr.Kislay Raj, Adv.
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr.Government Pleader (2)
For the SEC
Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Adv.
Mr. Girish Pandey, adv.
For the Zila Parishad
Mr. Vivek Pd., Adv.
For the Resp. No. 4
Mr. Pratiyush Kr., Adv.
Mr. Mukund Raj, Adv.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
19-08-2026 Mr. Kishlay Raj, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, submits that his client, Geeta Devi, never approached him for taking a “No Objection Vakalatnama” or for withdrawing the case.
2. A supplementary affidavit has been filed by Mr. Madhav Kumar Jha, Advocate, on behalf of the petitioner, containing false allegations.
Patna High Court CWJC No.18813 of 2024(11) dt.19-08-2026
3. Mr. Madhav Kumar Jha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, submits that his client does not want to pursue the present writ petition and seeks permission to withdraw the same.
4. Permissions is granted.
5. Having regard to the same, without prejudice to the contentions raised by Mr. Kishlay Raj, Advocate or the averments made in the supplementary affidavit filed by Mr. Madhav Kumar Jha, Advocate, on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Bhardwaj/- (A. Abhishek Reddy , J) U