Patna High Court
CR. MISC./57928/2026 of Shubham Kumar @ Gorakh Ram @ Shubham Ram Vs The State of Bihar on 19 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57928 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-134 Year-2026 Thana- NASRIGANJ District- Rohtas ====================================================== Shubham Kumar @ Gorakh Ram @ Shubham Ram Son of Krishna Ram Resident of Village- Pawani, P.S.-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57928 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-134 Year-2026 Thana- NASRIGANJ District- Rohtas ======================================================
Shubham Kumar @ Gorakh Ram @ Shubham Ram Son of Krishna Ram Resident of Village- Pawani, P.S.- Nasriganj, Distdrict- Rohtas
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Arvind Kumar Pandey, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Upendra Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
19-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Nasriganj P.S. Case No. 134 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 137(2), 87 and 3(5) of the BNS.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is alleged to have kidnapped the victim, who is the daughter of the informant, for the purpose of marriage.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. It has further been submitted, with reference to the impugned order, that paragraph No. 15 of the case diary Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57928 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026
mentions that the age of the victim, as per her educational certificate, was 17 years, 8 months and 24 days on the alleged date of occurrence. It has also been submitted that the impugned order has taken into consideration the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S., wherein she has stated that she is living a conjugal life with the petitioner as husband and wife. It has also been submitted that there was no element of “enticing away” or “taking away” as per her statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS. Moreover, the victim girl is on the verge of attaining majority and she was not of such tender age so as to not understand the consequences of her action. Lastly, it has been submitted that the petitioner has clean criminal antecedent and is in custody since 07.05.2026.
5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Heard the parties and perused the record.
7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above-named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Rohtas, in connection with Nasriganj P.S. Case No. 134 of 2026.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57928 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026
8. The application stands allowed.
Jyoti/- (Praveen Kumar, J) U T