Patna High Court
CR. MISC./57720/2026 of Baijnath Thakur @ Bejo Thakur Vs The State of Bihar on 19 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57720 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-90 Year-2026 Thana- BANGAWON District- Saharsa ====================================================== 1. Baijnath Thakur @ Bejo Thakur S/O Late Bhumi Thakur Resident of Parari, Ward No. 02, P.S-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57720 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-90 Year-2026 Thana- BANGAWON District- Saharsa ======================================================
1.
Baijnath Thakur @ Bejo Thakur S/O Late Bhumi Thakur Resident of Parari, Ward No. 02, P.S- Bangaon, District -Saharsa
2.
Suresh Thakur S/O Late Bhumi Thakur Resident of Parari, Ward No. 02, P.S- Bangaon, District -Saharsa
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Yashraj Bardhan, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ram Bilash Roy Raman, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
19-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Bangawon P.S. Case no.90 of 2026 registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 75, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 8(3) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023.
3. Allegation in the F.I.R is that petitioner no.2 assaulted the informant’s daughter with lathi and petitioner no.1 thrashed the informant and tried to outrage her modesty.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that it would be evident from the F.I.R. itself that petitioner no. 2 is alleged to have assaulted the informant’s daughter, however, she Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57720 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026
did not sustain any injury. So far as petitioner no. 1 is concerned, there is an allegation that he assaulted the informant and tore her clothes, however, there is no injury report on record. It is further submitted that, in fact, the incident occurred on account of previous enmity and the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case. It is also submitted that a counter-case has been instituted, wherein persons from the accused side have also sustained injuries. The petitioners have no criminal antecedents and undertake to cooperate with the investigation and the trial.
5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.
6. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that allegations against these petitioners are general and omnibus in nature, while the injuries are not specifically attributable to them and the other allegations are merely ornamental in nature, it is directed that the petitioners, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Bangawon P.S. Case no.90 of 2026 on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57720 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026
Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned where the case is pending/successor Court, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S, 2023.
Harsh/- (Soni Shrivastava, J) U T