Patna High Court
MJC/3419/2017 of Nishant Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar Through Amir Subhani, Home Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar and Ors on 19 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3419 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11478 of 2013 ====================================================== Nishant Kumar son of Sri Binay Kumar Singh, Resident of Mohalla- Mahatma Gandhi Nagar, Kanti Factory Road,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3419 of 2017
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11478 of 2013
======================================================
Nishant Kumar son of Sri Binay Kumar Singh, Resident of Mohalla- Mahatma Gandhi Nagar, Kanti Factory Road, Kankarbagh, Near Nala, P.S.
Agamkuan, Town and District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar Through Amir Subhani, Home Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar and Ors son of not known to petitioner,
2.
Sanjay Kumar Agrawal, son of not known to petitioner, District Magistrate, Patna.
3.
Manoj Kumar, son of not known to petitioner, District Arma Magistrate, Patna.
4.
Pankaj Kumar, son of not known to petitioner, Additional District Magistrate Arms, Patna.
5.
Manu Maharaj, son of not known to petitioner, Sr. Superintendent of Police, Patna.
... ... Opposite Party/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
None
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Ghosarvey, AC to AAG-3
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GIRIJISH KUMAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
19-08-2026 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner. However, learned counsel for the Opposite Party is present.
2. Learned counsel for the Opposite Party submits that the order dated 21.09.2015 passed in CWJC No. 11478 of 2013 has already been complied with and the Opposite Party No.2 passed a detailed and reasoned order on 13.11.2018 vide Memo No. 4152 i.e. Annexure-E to the show-cause filed by the Opposite Party No. 2 to 5.
Patna High Court MJC No.3419 of 2017(5) dt.19-08-2026
3. In view of the aforesaid submission, the contempt application is dropped.
4. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the reasoned and speaking order passed by the Opposite Party No. 2, then petitioner is at liberty to challenge the same before appropriate forum, in accordance with law, if so advised.
5. Accordingly, this contempt application is disposed of.
Aman/- (Girijish Kumar, J) U