Patna High Court
CR. MISC./44317/2026 of Md. Mojahid Vs The State of Bihar on 19 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44317 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-484 Year-2025 Thana- BIHARIGANJ District- Madhepura ====================================================== Md. Mojahid Son of Late Jannuddin Resident of Village- Dewel, ward no. 8, P.S.- Bihariganj,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44317 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-484 Year-2025 Thana- BIHARIGANJ District- Madhepura ======================================================
Md. Mojahid Son of Late Jannuddin Resident of Village- Dewel, ward no. 8, P.S.- Bihariganj, District- Madhepura
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Praveen Kumar Agrawal, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
Page 1 of 3
19-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Bihariganj P. S. Case No. 484 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109(1), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita to which, Section 103(1) BNS was added later on.
3. It is alleged that this petitioner along with other F.I.R. named accused persons brutally assaulted the father of informant as a result of which, he died during treatment.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus. Petitioner is in custody since 06.12.2025.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44317 of 2026(3) dt.19-08-2026
Page 2 of 3
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. with allegation of assault and during course of treatment, deceased took the name of this petitioner as one of the assailants.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.
7. However, since petitioner is in custody since 06.12.2025, Trial Court is directed to expedite and conclude the trial, preferably, within a period of one year from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order.
Navya/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…