Patna High Court
CR. MISC./57795/2026 of Dilip Yadav Vs The State of Bihar on 19 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57795 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-188 Year-2023 Thana- VIJAYEPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Dilip Yadav Son of Baleshar Yadav @ Baleshwar Yadav Resident of Village- Jajwalia, P.S.-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57795 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-188 Year-2023 Thana- VIJAYEPUR District- Gopalganj ======================================================
Dilip Yadav Son of Baleshar Yadav @ Baleshwar Yadav Resident of Village- Jajwalia, P.S.- Vijaipur, District- Gopalganj.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Satyendra Rai
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mrs. Meena Singh
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
19-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Vijaipur P.S. Case No.188 of 2023, FIR dated 08.07.2023, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506, 509 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the FIR, the petitioner along with other co-accused persons assaulted the informant by means of lathi, danda and iron rod due to which the informant sustained injuries.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner has been roped in this case on account of a petty dispute arising out of the fact that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57795 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026
the petitioner had slapped a child who was playing in front of the informant’s house. It is submitted that the petitioner was not present at the place of occurrence and has falsely been implicated for ulterior reasons, particularly when the injured person is his neighbour. It is next submitted that the injury sustained by the injured has been found to be simple in nature. Learned counsel, on instructions, further submits that, without admitting his guilt and without prejudice to his defence, and in order to give quietus to the ongoing dispute, the petitioner is willing to pay a sum of Rs. 2,000/- to the informant towards medical/financial assistance. Lastly, it is submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.
5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of allegation, the fact that the injury sustained by the injured has been found to be simple in nature, the petitioner has no criminal antecedents and, without admitting his guilt and without prejudice to his defence, he is willing to pay a sum of Rs. 2,000/- to the informant towards medical/financial assistance, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57795 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026
learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM-VI, Gopalganj/Successor Court in connection with Vijaipur P.S. Case No.188 of 2023 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS as well as the following conditions:
(i) One of the bailors should be the family member/relative/known of the petitioner(s) who shall provide official document/ personal affidavit to show his/her bona fide;
(ii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his/her/their bail bond by the Trial Court itself;
(iii) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;
(iv) the petitioner(s) shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds.
shikha/- (Ajit Kumar, J) U T