Patna High Court
MJC/1589/2017 of Laxmi Construction and Electrial Works Through Its Authorized Signatory Namely Chandradeep Singh Vs The State Of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, Mr. Chaityna Prasad, Urban And Housing Department, on 19 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1589 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18803 of 2015 ====================================================== Laxmi Construction and Electrial Works Through Its Authorized Signatory Namely Chandradeep Singh Son of Late
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1589 of 2017
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18803 of 2015
======================================================
Laxmi Construction and Electrial Works Through Its Authorized Signatory Namely Chandradeep Singh Son of Late Girdhari Singh, having Office at Ward No. 20, House No. 395, Laxmipur, Siwan Road, P.S-
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, Mr. Chaityna Prasad, Urban And Housing Department,
2.
The Nagar Parishad, Dehri through Executive Officer, Mr. Jamal Akkar, having office at Dehri Dalmia
3.
The Nagar Parishad, Dehri through Executive Officer, Mr. Jamal Akkar, having office at Dehri Dalmia
... ... Opposite Party/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Sanjeev Nikesh
For the State
:
Mr. Yogendra Prasad Sinha - AAG 15
For Nagar Parishad Dehri
:
Mr. Bindyachal Rai, Adv.
For Resp. No. 2,3
:
Mr. Avinash Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Ajay Kumar Mehta, Adv.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ KUMAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
19-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the opposite parties as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
2. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 3 has pointed out paragraph 6 of the show cause filed by him and he states that the direction which has been given by this Court for the disposal of the representation has already been complied with and a detailed order has been passed on 11.09.2020 vide Memo No. 1847 by the then Executive Officer.
Patna High Court MJC No.1589 of 2017(6) dt.19-08-2026
3. In view of the facts, this Court finds that there is no point in keeping this application pending.
4. Accordingly, the contempt application has become infructuous.
ashutosh/- (Raj Kumar, J) U