Patna High Court
CR. MISC./59324/2026 of Raju Paswan Vs The State of Bihar on 19 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59324 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-71 Year-2026 Thana- DARIGAON District- Rohtas ====================================================== Raju Paswan son of Late Ramdev Paswan Resident of Village -Soni PS -Karagahar Disttict- Rohtas ...
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59324 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-71 Year-2026 Thana- DARIGAON District- Rohtas ======================================================
Raju Paswan son of Late Ramdev Paswan Resident of Village -Soni PS
-Karagahar Disttict- Rohtas
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Singh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rina Sinha, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
19-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Darigaon P.S. Case No. 71 of 2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 61(2), of the BNS, 2023 and 25(1-b)a, 26, 27 and 35 of Arms Act.
3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that the informant’s son was killed because of his rivalry with other co-accused persons.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner’s name was added on confessional statement of one of the co-accused persons. The counsel further submits that the petitioner has clean antecedents and nothing to do with the alleged crime. The counsel lastly submits that the petitioner has Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59324 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026
falsely been implicated in this case and is in custody since 05.05.2026.
5. The learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for regular bail to the petitioner.
6. Having heard the parties and taking into consideration that the petitioner has clean antecedents and charge sheet has been filed and also the fact that the petitioner’s name has been subsequently added on confessional statement of other co-accused persons, I am inclined to grant the petitioner benefit of regular bail. Let the above named petitioner, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the likewise amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Darigaon P.S. Case No. 71 of 2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 61(2), of the BNS, 2023 and 25(1-b)a, 26, 27 and 35 of Arms Act., subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be the petitioner’s own or close family member. (II) The petitioner shall co-operate in the process of trial. (III) The petitioner shall not tamper with the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59324 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026
prosecution evidence or influence/intimidate any witness during the course of trial. (IV) The Petitioner shall not commit an offence of a similar nature in future. In case of violation of any of the aforesaid conditions, the Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
Anand/Emaad/- (Alok Kumar, J) U T