Patna High Court

CR. MISC./57587/2026 of Md. Khalik @ Mohammad Khalique Vs The State of Bihar on 19 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57587 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1208 Year-2017 Thana- SARAN COMPLAINT CASE District- Saran ====================================================== Md. Khalik @ Mohammad Khalique S/o Md. Sharif R/o- Resident of Ward No. 27, Bus Doodh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57587 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1208 Year-2017 Thana- SARAN COMPLAINT CASE District- Saran ======================================================

Md. Khalik @ Mohammad Khalique S/o Md. Sharif R/o- Resident of Ward No. 27, Bus Doodh Katora, P.O. Arrah, P.S.- Town, District- Bhojpur, Bihar

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr.Khalid Faizan Khurshid, Advocate

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Sevak Choudhary, APP

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

19-08-2026 Heard Mr. Khalid Faizan Khurshid, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 1208 of 2017 corresponding to Trail No. 1118 of 2026 instituted under Sections 494A, 323, 504, 506 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code and section 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 196.

3. At the outset, learned counsel for the State has pointed out to the learned Sessions Judge’s order to show that sections 82 and 83 of the Cr.P.C. already stands issued and further the allegation is of the year 2017 and he has moved before this Court nine years later.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57587 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026

4. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, it would be appropriate that he seek bail.

5. The anticipatory bail application stands rejected.

Ravi/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U T

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead