Patna High Court
CR. MISC./57903/2026 of Suman Devi Vs The State of Bihar on 19 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57903 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-36 Year-2026 Thana- GANGABRIDGE District- Vaishali ====================================================== Suman Devi Wife of Phool Chand Yadav @ Karun Kumar Resident of Mohalla- Pipra Devas, P.S.-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57903 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-36 Year-2026 Thana- GANGABRIDGE District- Vaishali ======================================================
Suman Devi Wife of Phool Chand Yadav @ Karun Kumar Resident of Mohalla- Pipra Devas, P.S.- Barauni, District- Begusarai.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Vinod Pandey, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
19-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Ganga Bridge P.S. Case No. 36 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 20(b) (ii)B, 29 of the NDPS Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, total 5 kg of ganja was recovered from the bag which the petitioner was carrying.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. It has further been submitted that the petitioner is a lady and she is in custody since 12.02.2026. It has further been submitted that the alleged recovered quantity is much less than Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57903 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026
the commercial quantity. Moreover, charges have already been framed in this case and the petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the trial. It has also been submitted that the procedure prescribed under Section 50 of the NDPS Act has not been followed. Lastly, it has been submitted that the petitioner has clean criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph No. 3 of the bail petition.
5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Heard the parties and perused the record.
7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the fact that the quantity of the alleged contraband is much below the commercial quantity and the charges have already been framed in this case, let the petitioner above-named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Ganga Bridge P.S. Case No. 36 of 2026, with condition(s):-
(i) the petitioner is directed to co- operate in the trial and remain physically present before the learned trial court on each and every date, failure on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57903 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026
the bail bonds of the petitioner would be liable to be cancelled.
8. The application stands allowed.
Jyoti/- (Praveen Kumar, J) U T