Patna High Court
CR. MISC./59282/2026 of Pankaj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 19 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59282 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-174 Year-2026 Thana- SAKURABAD District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1. Pankaj Kumar son of Late Haridas Sao Resident of Village and PS- Shakurabad District
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59282 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-174 Year-2026 Thana- SAKURABAD District- Jehanabad ======================================================
1.
Pankaj Kumar son of Late Haridas Sao Resident of Village and PS- Shakurabad District -Jehanabad
2.
Pappu Kumar Son of Late Haridas Sao Resident of Village and PS- Shakurabad District -Jehanabad
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Ms. Soni Kumari, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, A.P.P
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
19-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners seeks regular bail in connection with Shakurabad P.S. Case No. 174 of 2026 lodged on 20.06.2026, for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 109(1), 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that the petitioners and other co-accused persons assaulted the informant and his brother, which resulted in a grave injury to the brother of the informant.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59282 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026
the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the petitioners have clean antecedents and are in custody since 20.06.2026. The learned counsel also submits that the entire incident happened just because of business rivalry between the informant and the petitioners herein. The counsel lastly submits that there is a case and counter-case between the parties.
5. The learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.
6. Having heard the parties and taking into consideration that the petitioners have clean antecedents and also considering the fact that there is case and counter-case between the parties, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the likewise amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jehanabad in connection with Shakurabad P.S. Case No. 174 of 2026, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be the petitioners’ own or close family member. (II) The petitioners shall co-operate in the process of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59282 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026
trial. (III) The petitioners shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence or influence/intimidate any witness during the course of trial. (IV) The Petitioners shall not commit offence of a similar nature in future. In case of violation of any of the aforesaid conditions, the Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners.
Bipin/- (Alok Kumar, J) U T