CR. MISC./57758/2026 of Ashish Ramani @ Ashish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 19 August 2026

ORAL ORDER

19-08-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Singheshwar P.S. Case No.104 of 2026, F.I.R dated 15.03.2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 109(1), 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. According to prosecution case, in brief, is that on 13.03.2026 at about 8:30 P.M., the informant and his co-villager Md. Taufiq were allegedly assaulted by the FIR-named accused persons outside Body Care Gym at Singheshwar. The accused allegedly objected to their entering the gym and threatened to kill them. Kailash Ramani and Himanshu Ramani allegedly assaulted them with iron rods, causing injuries and bleeding.

When Md. Nayab and Md. Waqar intervened, they were also assaulted. Md. Taufiq became unconscious and was allegedly left for dead, while Pintu Langra allegedly took Rs.4,500 from his pocket. The injured persons were initially taken to Singheshwar Hospital and thereafter referred to Jan Nayak Karpuri Thakur Medical College and Hospital, Madhepura, for treatment.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. It has next been submitted that the specific allegation of assault is against Kailash Ramani and Himanshu Ramani and there is nothing specific against this petitioner to suggest his complicity in the commission of said offence. It has lastly been submitted that the petitioner has clean antecedent and undertakes to cooperate with the investigation / Trial.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances that the specific allegation of assault is against Kailash Ramani and Himanshu Ramani and there is nothing specific against this petitioner to suggest his complicity in the commission of said offence and the petitioner has clean antecedent. Accordingly, this Court is inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his/her arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned District and Additional Sessions Judge-IX, Madhepura, in connection with Singheshwar P.S. Case No.104 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure / Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and with other following conditions:-

(i) one of the bailors should be the family member/relative/known of the petitioner(s) who shall provide official document/personal affidavit to show his/her bona fide;

(ii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his/her/their bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

(iii) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;

(iv) the petitioner(s) shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds.

sharun/- (Ajit Kumar, J) U T