Patna High Court
MJC/3219/2017 of Prof. Mahasweta Ghosh Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department, Govt. Of Bihar an on 19 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3219 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18381 of 2015 ====================================================== Prof. Mahasweta Ghosh wife of Late Ranjan Narayan, Resident of 304, Shantikunj Apartments, T.N. Banerjee Road,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3219 of 2017
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18381 of 2015
======================================================
Prof. Mahasweta Ghosh wife of Late Ranjan Narayan, Resident of 304, Shantikunj Apartments, T.N. Banerjee Road, Chajjubagh, P.S.- Gandhi Maidan, Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna
2.
Mr. Abhishek Singh, Patna Municipal Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation, Dak Bunglow Road, Maurya Lok Complex, PS-Kotwali, Patna
3.
Mr. Anil Kumar Agarwal, son of not known, at present residing at 404, Shantikunj Apartments, T.N. Banerjee Road, Chajjubagh, P.S.- Gandhi Maidan, Patna.
... ... Opposite Party/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
None
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Yogendra Pd. Sinha - Aag 7
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
4 19-08-2026 No one appears for the petitioner whereas the learned counsel for the State is present.
2. In view of the fact that the present contempt petition is of the year 2017 and the defect has not yet been removed, it seems that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed.
3. With the aforesaid observation, the present contempt petition is disposed off.
rinkee/- (Alok Kumar, J) U