Patna High Court
CR. MISC./30021/2026 of Mithun Das Vs The State of Bihar on 19 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30021 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-45 Year-2025 Thana- BANGARA District- Samastipur ====================================================== Mithun Das S/o- Sakindar Das Resident of Village- Sahuri PS-Chakmaheshi Dist- Samastipur ...
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30021 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-45 Year-2025 Thana- BANGARA District- Samastipur ======================================================
Mithun Das S/o- Sakindar Das Resident of Village- Sahuri PS-Chakmaheshi Dist- Samastipur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar
2.
XXX D/o- YYY R/v- Dadridhanraj Ps- Bangra Dist- Samastipur
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Raja Ram Mishra
For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Sangeeta Sharma
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
19-08-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. None appears on behalf of the O.P. No. 2 despite valid service of notice.
2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Bangra P.S. Case No. 45 of 2025 registered for the offence under Section(s) 64, 89 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 4 of the POCSO Act.
3. The allegation against the petitioner is that, on the pretext of marriage, he established a physical relationship with the victim.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence. The petitioner has been granted provisional bail by order dated Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30021 of 2026(5) dt.19-08-2026
06.05.2026 and has not misused the privilege of bail.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of allegation, the period of custody already undergone by the petitioner and the fact that the petitioner has not misused the privilege of provisional bail, this Court is of the view that the provisional bail granted to the petitioner on 06.05.2026 deserves to be confirmed.
7. Accordingly, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner by order dated 06.05.2026 is hereby confirmed. The petitioner is directed to furnish fresh bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Bangra P.S. Case No. 45 of 2025.
8. It is made clear that any observation made herein is prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any manner.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30021 of 2026(5) dt.19-08-2026
9. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the application stands allowed.
Shishir/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T