Patna High Court
CR. MISC./57483/2026 of Rambhu Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar on 19 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57483 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-150 Year-2026 Thana- KALYANPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== Rambhu Manjhi Son of Late Sukal Manjhi Resident of Village - Shambhu Chak, Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57483 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-150 Year-2026 Thana- KALYANPUR District- East Champaran ======================================================
Rambhu Manjhi Son of Late Sukal Manjhi Resident of Village - Shambhu Chak, Police Station - Kalyanpur, District - East Champaran at Motihari.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Shashank Shekhar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
19-08-2026 Heard Mr. Shashank Shekhar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 150 of 2026 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, 60 litres of illicit liquor was recovered from the house of the petitioner.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner resides in a joint family house where several family members reside, and he had no knowledge of the alleged liquor. He Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57483 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026
further submitted that the seizure was not conducted in accordance with the provisions of Section 100 of the Cr.P.C. On these grounds, learned counsel seeks that the petitioner be released on pre-arrest bail.
5. Per contra, learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.
6. Having heard the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, having perused the allegation made in the F.I.R. and the fact that the alleged recovery was made from a joint house where several family members reside, and he had no knowledge of the alleged liquor kept therein, and also the fact that the seizure was not conducted in accordance with the provisions of Section 100 of the Cr.P.C/ 103 BNSS, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Concerned Court where the case is pending in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 150 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57483 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026
BNSS.
7. The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that the petitioner is involved in some other cases, as what has been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail application, this order will automatically lose its force.
Sanjay/- (Purnendu Singh, J) U T