Patna High Court
CR. MISC./59422/2026 of Mukesh Yadav @ Mukesh Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar on 19 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59422 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-182 Year-2017 Thana- MOTIHARI MUFASIL District- East Champaran ====================================================== Mukesh Yadav @ Mukesh Kumar Yadav S/o Jotik Rai @ Jotik Yadav Resident of
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59422 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-182 Year-2017 Thana- MOTIHARI MUFASIL District- East Champaran ======================================================
Mukesh Yadav @ Mukesh Kumar Yadav S/o Jotik Rai @ Jotik Yadav Resident of Village- Barhadwa, P.S.- Muffasil, District- East Champaran, Bihar- 845401
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, Advocate
Mr. Nitish Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Raj Kishor Singh, A.P.P
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
19-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 182 of 2017 lodged on 21.04.2017, for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 504, 324, 420, 427, 467 and 468 of the I.P.C.
3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that a mutual partition of ancestral property took place among the informant's father and his brother. The dispute arose when the informant came to know that the petitioner herein and other co-accused persons were filling the land with soil and destroying crop. After inquiring, the informant came to know that the accused persons Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59422 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026
are engaged in illegal transfer of his land by fraud and forgery.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner has clean antecedents and is in custody since 22.02.2026. The counsel lastly submits that the petitioner is the legitimate owner of the land in question and he has purchased the said land from the bonafide vendor.
5. The learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Having heard the parties and taking into consideration that the petitioner has clean antecedents and he is in custody since 22.02.2026, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the likewise amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Motihari, East Champaran in connection withMuffasil P.S. Case No. 182 of 2017, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be the petitioner's own or close family member. (II) The petitioner shall co-operate in the process of trial.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59422 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026
(III) The petitioner shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence or influence/intimidate any witness during the course of trial. (IV) The Petitioner shall not commit offence of a similar nature in future. In case of violation of any of the aforesaid conditions, the Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
Bipin/- (Alok Kumar, J) U T