Patna High Court

CR. MISC./58190/2026 of Md. Majhar Ansari Vs The State of Bihar on 19 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58190 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-125 Year-2026 Thana- NAUHATTA District- Saharsa ====================================================== Md. Majhar Ansari S/O Badrul Ansari @ Badruddin Ansari R/O Village- Raghopur Ghore, P.S- Supaul,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58190 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-125 Year-2026 Thana- NAUHATTA District- Saharsa ======================================================

Md. Majhar Ansari S/O Badrul Ansari @ Badruddin Ansari R/O Village- Raghopur Ghore, P.S- Supaul, District- Supaul.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Priyanshu Ranjan, Advocate

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Syed Mojibur Rahman, APP

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH

MISHRA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

19-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Nauhatta P.S. Case No. 125 of 2026, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that one country made pistol has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. It is next submitted Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58190 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026

that the petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of arms. The alleged recovery has been made from an open place and the petitioner has been arrested only on the basis of suspicion. The petitioner is in custody since 08.06.2026 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Nauhatta P.S. Case No. 125 of 2026.

Rajorshi/- (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) U T

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead