Patna High Court
CR. MISC./59135/2026 of Shrawan Kumar @ Shrawan Vs The State of Bihar on 19 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59135 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-210 Year-2026 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Shrawan Kumar @ Shrawan Son of Late Suresh Das Resident of Village- Mohanpur, P.S.-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59135 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-210 Year-2026 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali ======================================================
Shrawan Kumar @ Shrawan Son of Late Suresh Das Resident of Village- Mohanpur, P.S.- Mohanpur (Patori), District- Samastipur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Vasant Vikas, Advocate
For the State
:
Mr. Surendra Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
19-08-2026 Heard Mr. Vasant Vikas, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Surendra Kumar, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Hajipur Sadar P.S. Case No. 210 of 2026, F.I.R. dated 01.04.2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 80, 61(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition (D.P.) Act.
3. Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture and caused death due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59135 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026
petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. The petitioner has been made accused merely on the ground that the petitioner is brother-in-law of the deceased. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the deceased and her husband are living separately from the petitioner and petitioner has no role at all in the present occurrence and apart from aforesaid, it appears from the F.I.R. that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner rather there is general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons including the petitioner and husband of the deceased who happens to be the brother of the petitioner is in judicial custody.
5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Hajipur Sadar P.S. Case No. 210 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59135 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026
the Code of Criminal Procedure/ Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023 and with other following conditions :-
(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
Ibrar//- (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) U T