Patna High Court
CR. MISC./57461/2026 of Subodh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 19 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57461 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-191 Year-2026 Thana- ATRI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1. Subodh Kumar Son of Ramdeo Prasad Resident of Village- Naudiha, P.S.- Atri, District- Gaya 2. Sujit
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57461 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-191 Year-2026 Thana- ATRI District- Gaya
======================================================
1.
Subodh Kumar Son of Ramdeo Prasad Resident of Village- Naudiha, P.S.- Atri, District- Gaya
2.
Sujit Kumar Son of Ramdeo Prasad Resident of Village- Naudiha, P.S.- Atri, District- Gaya
3.
Ramashish Prasad Son of Mani Yadav Resident of Village- Sitarampur, P.S.- Atri, District- Gaya
4.
Ramdeo Prasad Son of Mani Yadav Resident of Village- Sitarampur, P.S.- Atri, District- Gaya
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Aryan Singh, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ram Sumiran Rai, APP.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
19-08-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Atri P.S. Case No. 191 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 117(2), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the BNS.
3. As per the allegation made in the F.I.R. the petitioners along with other co-accused with a common intention to kill assaulted the informant and his family members causing them injuries on head and hand.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57461 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in the case. The allegation alleged against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus. The injuries sustained by the victim is not on the vital part of the body. The petitioners have clean antecedent. On these grounds, learned counsel seeks that the petitioners be released on pre-arrest bail.
5. Per contra, learned APP for the State, opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.
6. Having heard the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, having perused the allegation made in the FIR as well as the material which has surfaced in course of investigation and the fact that the allegation against the petitioner nos. 3 and 4 is general and omnibus, they are directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-II, Gaya in connection with Atri P.S. Case No. 191 of 2026, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C / 482(2) BNSS
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57461 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026
7. So far as the petitioner nos. 1 and 2 are concerned, learned District Court is directed to verify the injuries sustained by the informant and his family members which are attributable to the petitioner nos. 1 and 2 and if it is found that the injuries attributable to the petitioner nos. 1 and 2 are simple in nature, then in that case, the petitioner nos. 1 and 2 be released on pre-arrest bail, on such terms and conditions as the learned District Court deems fit and proper, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
8. The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and if it is found that the petitioners are involved in some other cases, as what has been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail application, this order will automatically lose its force.
9. The bail application, accordingly, stands disposed of.
mantreshwar/- (Purnendu Singh, J) U