Patna High Court
CR. MISC./59258/2026 of Lalu Das @ Chhotka Vs The State of Bihar on 19 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59258 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-336 Year-2023 Thana- SARAI RANJAN District- Samastipur ====================================================== Lalu Das @ Chhotka Son of Late Vishwanath Das Resident of Village- Chanchaur, P.S.-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59258 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-336 Year-2023 Thana- SARAI RANJAN District- Samastipur ======================================================
Lalu Das @ Chhotka Son of Late Vishwanath Das Resident of Village- Chanchaur, P.S.- Sarairanjan, District- Samastipur, Bihar- 848101.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Piyush Kumar Pandey, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Awadhesh Kumar Singh, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
19-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sarai Ranjan P.S. Case No. 336 of 2023 (G.R. No. 4066 of 2023) instituted for the offences under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The Prosecution case, in short, is that three unknown miscreants looted the motorcycle, mobile phone, cash of Rs. 18000/-, ATM Cards and credit card of the informant.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that the name of petitioner surfaced in this case on the confessional statement of co-accused Md. Arman. The counsel lastly submits that the petitioner is in custody since Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59258 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026
13.05.2026 and he has one criminal antecedents in which Final Form has been submitted.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Having heard the parties, considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Sarai Ranjan P.S. Case No. 336 of 2023, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be the petitioner’s own or close member. (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed during the trial and shall not remain absent on two consecutive dates without sufficient cause. (III) The petitioner shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence or influence/intimidate any witness during the course of trial. In case of violation of any of the aforesaid conditions, Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59258 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026
the Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
Manish/- (Alok Kumar, J) U T