Patna High Court
CR. MISC./12259/2026 of Jitendra Kumar @ Jitendra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar on 19 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12259 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-407 Year-2024 Thana- BABUBARHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1. Jitendra Kumar @ Jitendra Yadav S/O Devendra Yadav R/O Village - Barail, P.S- Babubarhi,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12259 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-407 Year-2024 Thana- BABUBARHI District- Madhubani
======================================================
1.
Jitendra Kumar @ Jitendra Yadav S/O Devendra Yadav R/O Village - Barail, P.S- Babubarhi, Distt.- Madhubani
2.
Ram Bharos Yadav S/O Gyachan Yadav R/O Village - Barail, P.S- Babubarhi, Distt.- Madhubani
3.
Bhogendra Yadav @ Bhogendra Kr.Yadav S/O Bokai Yadav R/O Village - Barail, P.S- Babubarhi, Distt.- Madhubani
4.
Bokai Yadav S/O Late Jay Lal Yadav R/O Village - Barail, P.S- Babubarhi, Distt.- Madhubani
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Mrityunjay Jha, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Bharat Lal, APP
For the Informant : Mr. Gagandeo Yadav, Adv.
Mr. Udeshya Kumar Yadav, Adv.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
19-08-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned APP for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the inormant.
2. The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126,115(2),118(1),117(2),352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no.1 and 3 were arrested, thus seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application on their behalf.
4. Permission is accorded.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12259 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026
5. Learned counsel for the petitioners after some argument seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application with respect to petitioner no.2.
6. Permission is accorded.
7. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case and is a senior citizen aged about 70 years and the informant alleges that on 08.09.2024 at 9.00 P.M., Bhogendra, Jitendra and Ram Bharose came in a drunken state and started abusing, thereafter all the accused persons including the petitioner came and assaulted his father and brother causing injury on head and his brother suffered a fracture of hand and even his mother was assaulted on account of which her finger got fractured, further the accused persons also assaulted the informant.
8. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that informant specifically alleges that Bhogendra, Jitendra and Ram Bharose came in a drunken state and started abusing and on objection, the accused persons including the petitioner came and assaulted causing injury to the injured. It is further submitted that in the occurrence, four persons were injured and the injury of three of the injured has been opined to Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12259 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026
be grievous in nature but then it is submitted that petitioner has been falsely implicated with general and omnibus allegation of assault.
9. Learned A.P.P. as well as the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant opposes the anticipatory bail application
10. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and also taking into consideration the fact that petitioner is a senior citizen aged about 70 years and allegation of assault is not specific, the petitioner no.4, above- named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks, are directed to be released on anticipatory bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Babubarhi P. S. Case No.407 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.
amit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T