Patna High Court
CR. MISC./59253/2026 of Mohammad Mosahil Vs The State of Bihar on 19 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59253 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-147 Year-2025 Thana- SHIKARGANJ District- East Champaran ====================================================== Mohammad Mosahil S/O Md. Sagir Alam @ Md. Sagir R/O Vill.- Sikarganj, P.s.- Sikarganj,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59253 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-147 Year-2025 Thana- SHIKARGANJ District- East Champaran ======================================================
Mohammad Mosahil S/O Md. Sagir Alam @ Md. Sagir R/O Vill.- Sikarganj, P.s.- Sikarganj, District- East Champaran
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Rajesh Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Manoj Kumar, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
19-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sikarganj P.S. case No. 147 of 2025, instituted for the offences under Sections 317(4) and 317(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. The Prosecution case, in short, is that the accused persons named in the F.I.R., including the petitioner, are involved in sell and purchase of stolen motorcycle.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the name of the petitioner surfaced in this case on the confessional statement of apprehended accused persons. He further submits that the petitioner has nothing to do with the stolen motorcycle.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59253 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026
The counsel lastly submits that the petitioner is in custody since 02.03.2026 and he has six criminal antecedents.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Having heard the parties. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, taking into consideration the criminal history of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.
7. Accordingly, the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner is, hereby, rejected.
manish/- (Alok Kumar, J) U T