Patna High Court
CR. MISC./41437/2026 of Raj Mangal Prasad Vs The State of Bihar on 19 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41437 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-51 Year-2021 Thana- RAJEPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== Raj Mangal Prasad S/o Bhukhal Bhagat Resident of Village - Sidhawaliya, Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41437 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-51 Year-2021 Thana- RAJEPUR District- East Champaran ======================================================
Raj Mangal Prasad S/o Bhukhal Bhagat Resident of Village - Sidhawaliya, Police Station-Rajepur, District - East Champaran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Rajesh Ranjan, Advocate
Mr. Himanshu Ranjan, Advocate
For the State
:
Mr. Satyendra Prasad, A.P.P.
For the Informant
:
Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Mr. Hemant Ray, Advocates ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
Page 1 of 3
19-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Rajepur P. S. Case No. 51 of 2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 302, 307, 326, 504, 506, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Informant alleges that all the F.I.R. named accused persons assaulted by means of iron rod and killed her father-in- law.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner not named in the F.I.R. It is specific case of the informant that all the nine F.I.R. named accused persons killed her father-in- Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41437 of 2026(3) dt.19-08-2026
Page 2 of 3
law. Informant is an eye witness to the occurrence and she has not named this petitioner as one of the assailants of the deceased. Petitioner is in custody since 04.05.2026.
5. However, learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the nature of accusation and period of custody, this bail application is allowed. The petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Rajepur P. S. Case No. 51 of 2021.
Navya/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…