Patna High Court
CR. APP (SJ)/1286/2025 of Nawal Kishore Shah Vs The State of Bihar on 19 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1286 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-231 Year-2023 Thana- PATAHI District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1. Nawal Kishore Shah Son of Parikshan Shah village- Patahi Tola Nankar P.S. -Patahi Dist
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1286 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-231 Year-2023 Thana- PATAHI District- East Champaran
======================================================
1.
Nawal Kishore Shah Son of Parikshan Shah village- Patahi Tola Nankar P.S.
-Patahi Dist -East Champaran
2.
Baiju Shah son of Shankar Shah village- Patahi Tola Nankar P.S. -Patahi Dist -East Champaran
3.
Krishan Shah Son of Shankar Shah village- Patahi Tola Nankar P.S. -Patahi Dist -East Champaran
4.
Pukar Shah Son of shankar Shah village- Patahi Tola Nankar P.S. -Patahi Dist -East Champaran
5.
Munna Shah son of Lt Sitaram Shah village- Patahi Tola Nankar P.S. -Patahi Dist -East Champaran
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar
2.
Mithlesha Devi Son of Nanhak Das village- Patahi Tola Nankar P.S. -Patahi Dist -East Champaran
... ... Respondent/s
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s
:
Mr. Dhannjay Kumar Ii, Advocate
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr. Sadanand Paswan, Special PP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
4 19-08-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned Special P.P. for the State, Mr. Sadanand Paswan.
2. The learned counsel for the appellants, at the outset, seeks permission to withdraw the appeal.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Rishabh/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T