Patna High Court

CR. MISC./56271/2026 of Harishchandra Yadav @ Hari Babu @ Harish Chandra Prasad Yadav Vs The State of Bihar on 19 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56271 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-640 Year-2025 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul ====================================================== Harishchandra Yadav @ Hari Babu @ Harish Chandra Prasad Yadav Son of Late Basudeo Yadav Resident of

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56271 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-640 Year-2025 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul

======================================================

Harishchandra Yadav @ Hari Babu @ Harish Chandra Prasad Yadav Son of Late Basudeo Yadav Resident of Mohalla- Kanke road, Hatma, Morabadi, P.S.- Kanke, District- Ranchi, Presently residing at Mohalla- Nagar Parishad Supaul, Ward No. -09, Lohiyanagar, P.S.- Supaul, District- Supaul, Bihar-

852131.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar

2.

Prakash Yadav @ Mishriya Son of Late Manjan Yadav @ Menjan Yadav Resident of Mohalla- Nagar Parishad Supaul, Ward No. 27, P.S.- Supaul, District- Supaul, State- Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Kuldeep Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, APP

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

19-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The present application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking cancellation of regular bail granted to the O.P. No. 2 vide order dated 10.04.2026 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Supaul in B.A. No. 126 of 2026.

3. Perused the records.

4. Having considered the submissions of the parties and the materials available on record, this Court finds that no supervening circumstance has been brought on record to show that O.P. No. 2 has misused the privilege of bail or violated any Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56271 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026

of the conditions imposed by the learned court below. No material has been placed before this Court to justify interference with the order granting bail. Therefore, this Court finds no sufficient ground to interfere with the impugned order.

5. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed.

6. However, the Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as early as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of communication of this order and shall submit a compliance report before this Court after expiry of the said period.

7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Supaul through FAX for immediate compliance.

sadique/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead