Patna High Court
CR. MISC./55573/2026 of Shweta Kumari Vs The State of Bihar on 19 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55573 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-354 Year-2018 Thana- WARISLIGANJ District- Nawada ====================================================== Shweta Kumari W/O Chandan Kumar Singh, D/O Sri Rabindra Kumar Bharti R/o Village- Daulatpur,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55573 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-354 Year-2018 Thana- WARISLIGANJ District- Nawada
======================================================
Shweta Kumari W/O Chandan Kumar Singh, D/O Sri Rabindra Kumar Bharti R/o Village- Daulatpur, P.S.- Warisaliganj, District- Nawada, Bihar-805130
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar
2.
Chandan Kumar Singh S/o Chakradhar Singh Permanent R/o- Daualatchak, P.S.- Kashichak, District- Nawada, At Present- House No. 39, Prapti Estate, Chira Chas, P.O. and P.S. - Chas, Bokaro Steel City, Jharkhand 827013., At Work- Supply Chain Advisor - Real Estate Operations Excellence, Shell India Markets Private Limited, 6th Floor, RMZ Eco World, Campus 4A and 4B, Sarjapur-Marathahalli, P.S.- Sarjapura, Outer Ring Road, Bengaluru, Karnataka - 560103
... ... Opposite Party/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Abhinay Priyadarshi, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
19-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The present application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the O.P. No. 2 vide order dated 24.10.2019 passed by the Co- ordinate Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 26162 of 2019.
3. Perused the records.
4. Having considered the submissions of the parties and the materials available on record, this Court finds that no supervening circumstance has been brought on record to show Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55573 of 2026(2) dt.19-08-2026
that O.P. No. 2 has misused the privilege of bail or violated any of the conditions imposed by the learned court below. No material has been placed before this Court to justify interference with the order granting bail. Therefore, this Court finds no sufficient ground to interfere with the impugned order.
5. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed.
6. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file a maintenance case, if not already filed, before the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Nawada in accordance with law and if any such maintenance case is filed, the same shall be considered and disposed of by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Nawada expeditiously.
7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Nawada through FAX for immediate compliance.
sadique/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T