Patna High Court
CR. MISC./23541/2026 of Rambali @ Rambali Yadav Vs The State of Bihar on 18 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23541 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-127 Year-2025 Thana- BARABAR TOURIST District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1. Rambali @ Rambali Yadav S/O Late Chhotu Yadav Resident of Village- Kanhaibigha,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23541 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-127 Year-2025 Thana- BARABAR TOURIST District- Jehanabad
======================================================
1.
Rambali @ Rambali Yadav S/O Late Chhotu Yadav Resident of Village- Kanhaibigha, P.S.- Bishunganj, Distt.- Jehanabad.
2.
Ram Subit Yadav S/O Rambali Yadav Resident of Village- Kanhaibigha, P.S.- Bishunganj, Distt.- Jehanabad.
3.
Nagendra Yadav S/O Rambali Yadav Resident of Village- Kanhaibigha, P.S.- Bishunganj, Distt.- Jehanabad.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Sameer Darshan, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
18-08-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3), 303(2), 117(2), 109(1) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no.1 has antecedent of two cases and petitioner no.2 and 3 have antecedent of one case and the informant alleges that a dispute arose in between Pramod and Nagendra regarding sand and Nagendra threatened to kill, further on 17.10.2025, Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23541 of 2026(5) dt.18-08-2026
while informant along with others were going home when Nagendra in a drunken condition started abusing, on objection, Rambali, Ram Subit, Satish, Arun and Nagendra assaulted Sampu with knife causing injury on stomach and back and also assaulted the informant by knife on back and forehead causing injury, while Arun assaulted Prem by lathi causing fracture of hand and Ram Subit snatched Rs.5000/- and chain, while Nagendra fired in the air and Satish was carrying gun.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners after some argument realizing her difficulty seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application with liberty to the petitioners to surrender and seek regular bail. It is submitted that co-accused Arun Yadav was granted the privilege of regular bail by the learned District Court.
5. Permission is accorded.
6. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioners is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.
amit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T