Patna High Court
CR. MISC./40706/2026 of Ajay Kumar Yadav @ Anil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar on 18 August 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40706 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2026 Thana- MARAUNA District- Supaul ====================================================== Ajay Kumar Yadav @ Anil Kumar Son of Lakshman Yadav @ Laxman Yadav Resident Of Village- Parikonch,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40706 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2026 Thana- MARAUNA District- Supaul ======================================================
Ajay Kumar Yadav @ Anil Kumar Son of Lakshman Yadav @ Laxman Yadav Resident Of Village- Parikonch, Tola Khap, Ward No 05, Ps- Marauna, Dist -Supaul
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar
2.
XX Son of Sitaram Mukhiya Resident Of Village- Parikonch, Tola Khap, Ward No 05, Ps- Marauna, Dist -Supaul
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Amar Nath Yadav, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anish Chandra, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
18-08-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 137(2), 96, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 4 and 6 of POCSO Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that his minor daughter aged about 15 years was kidnapped by the petitioner and others.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40706 of 2026(3) dt.18-08-2026
informant. It is next submitted that the victim came back and her statement was recorded under sections 180 and 183 BNSS, wherein she has not supported the case of the prosecution.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State after perusing the case diary and the statement of the victim recorded under sections 180 and 183 BNSS, fairly submits that victim has not supported the case of the prosecution.
6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Marauna P.S. Case No.01 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) B.N.S.S.
amit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T